The project directly finances physical infrastructure (Subcomponents 1.2 and Component 2) and supports soft interventions (Subcomponents 1.1 and 1.3) related to climate change adaptation and disaster risk mainstreaming. Climate co-benefits will be derived through (a) interventions to protect watersheds resulting in increased land area under sustainable landscape management practices and prevention of further degradation/sedimentation, and (b) increased area with improved irrigation resulting from better conveyance (gravity fed) and storage of water.
Restoring priority watersheds will have the larger benefit of maintaining the ecosystem and biodiversity. The ecosystem services of watersheds are complex and diverse and so are the benefits from watershed restoration. Some of the key quantified benefits expected are the following:
(a) | Improved irrigation from small tanks |
Number of small tanks to be rehabilitated | 8 | Number |
Average command area per tank | 10 | ha |
Total command area of tanks | 400 | ha |
Increase in net incomes | 70,000 | LKR/ha |
Annual benefit of tank rehabilitation | 0.03 | US$, millions |
Table 1: Benefits of Improved Irrigation from Small Tanks
(b) | Reduced electricity supply disruptions to change silt filters in hydroelectric plants on key dams especially during high silt-load monsoon flows. |
If electricity breakdowns are reduced by 2 hours per year, because of reduced siltation in the river water (necessitating fewer shutdowns to clean or replace filters of the hydroelectricity turbines), all electricity consumers in the area will benefit not only from having power but also from not having to use expensive diesel for captive power generator sets. Assuming that there are around 10,000 diesel generating sets in the major establishments in the major towns (including shops, restaurants, hotels, and hospitals) in the catchment if such sets are used, and that each saves two hours per year, this provides an annual benefit of around US$0.02 million |
Number of diesel generator sets in the Upper Mahaweli Watershed | 10,000 |
Number of hours saved per year due to reduced silt | 2 |
Annual hours of generation saved | 60,000 |
Diesel consumed per hour (liters) | 1.5 |
Cost of diesel (LKR per liter) | 100 |
Annual benefit of improved electricity supply (US$, millions) | 0.02 |
Table 2: Benefits of Reduced Electricity Shutdowns
(c) | Reduced drinking water supply shutdowns |
The National Water Supply and Drainage Board supplies around 160,000 m3 per day through 15 water treatment plants in the watershed but has to stop operations when turbidity levels go over the treatment capacity (125 NTU). In 2018, turbidity levels were over 400 MTU for 7 months of the year (April–June and August–November). Although the plants were shut only during severe bouts of turbidity, disruptions of drinking water supply force urban consumers to buy water from private suppliers. Assuming that the plants worked at only 50 percent of capacity during the 7 months, this project reduces the days of service disruption by 15 percent and given that the price of buying water from private suppliers is around LKR 24 per liter, the total cost of turbidity-linked disruptions of water supply—and the benefit of reducing turbidity—is US$0.34 million per year. |
Capacity of 15 river-side water treatment plants in the Upper Mahaweli Watershed | 160,320 | Cubic meters per day |
Days when turbidity was higher than treatment capacity | 210 | Days (7 months) |
Drinking water supply during days of high turbidity | 50% | |
Annual quantity of water purchased privately during low supply | 168.34 | Million m3 |
Reduction rate of high turbidity days | 15% | |
Cost of water from private suppliers | 24 | LKR/liter |
Annual value of benefits of improved water supply | 0.34 | US$, millions |
Table 3: Benefits of Improved Drinking Water Supply
(d) | Soil conservation on sloping seasonal crop land. |
Using the nutrient replacement method for calculating the economic benefits of soil conservation, the costs of replacing the quantity of N, P, and K removed by soil erosion across this untreated area are US$0.66 million per year. |
On Site | |||
Price (LKR/kg) | Quantity (kg/ha) | Cost (LKR/ha) | |
N | 242 | 53 | 12,826 |
P | 268 | 388 | 103,984 |
K | 187 | 7 | 1,309 |
Organic manure | 1 | 653 | 653 |
Labor | 540 | ||
Transportation | 100 | 100 | |
Total | 119,412 |
Table 4: Unit Benefit from Soil Conservation
Cost (LKR/ha) | Area (ha) | Value (US$, millions) | |
On-farm conservation | 119,412 | 1,000 | 0.66 |
Table 5: Soil Conservation Benefits
There are approximately 430 medium and large dams in Sri Lanka and over 12,000 small dams, most of which were built more than 1,000 years ago. Large reservoirs such as Kothmale, Victoria and Randenigala were built under the Mahaweli Projects. They are also now 30 years old and prone to cracks and leaks. This situation threatens the safety and operational efficiency of dams and their structures. If dam safety risks are not addressed before it is too late, the safety of lives, property and the environment could face serious threat.
Risks to the public and properties due to dam failures are minimized with the reduction of occurrence of dam failures through develop Operation and Maintenance Plans and mitigation measures and taking emergency actions to minimize risks by preparing Emergency Preparedness Plan if dam failures occur. The probability of occurrence of dam failures is being reduced by the ongoing DSWRP Project through various measures of rehabilitation of dams and structures such as riprap, spill and sluice and followed by carrying out Dams Portfolio Risk Assessment for the selected dams and classifying based on the Risk Index Scheme.
In order to minimize damages to the people and properties and dams due to critical situations, emergency action plans are being prepared for High-Risk Dams, whereby reducing the risk surrounding the downstream of the Dam and to protect the population at risk when failures occur.
Operation and maintenance (O&M) manuals are to be prepared for the dams where it classifies as high risk, to ensure the sustainability of the project works and ensure its safe operation. The following areas are discussed in O&M manuals, with respect to earth dams.
• | Secure about 357,000 families living under the 36 dams and 19 Schemes/Canals and their properties by increasing the safety of dams and structures. |
Dam/Scheme | Storage Capacity (MCM) | Improved Command Area (Ha) | Beneficiaries (Families) |
Victoria Dam | 722 | - | 82,000 |
Randenigala Dam | 861 | - | 3,600 |
Kotmale Dam | 175 | - | 15,700 |
Rantambe Dam | 21 | 18,595 | 34,171 |
Udawalawe Dam | 267 | 19,499 | 41,000 |
Polgolla Barrage | 4 | - | 350 |
Senanayaka Samudraya | 950 | 48,342 | 52,300 |
Arawatta Tank | 1.85 | 350 | 80 |
Peramadu Tank | 3.0 | 250 | 287 |
Lunugamwehera Reservoir | 226 | 5,466 | 10,000 |
Vahanery Tank | 68 | 3,583 | 2,500 |
Bathalagoda Anicut | 6 | 3,091 | 2,025 |
Mavilaru Tank | 5 | 10,000 | 10,000 |
Dewahuwa Tank | 14 | 1,215 | 2,025 |
Pavatkulam Tank | 33.3 | 1,619 | 1,726 |
Nagadeepa Tank | 29 | 607 | 5,000 |
Hali Ela Tank | 3.85 | 100 | 350 |
Mahalindawewa Tank | 4.5 | 184 | 140 |
Wadamunai Tank | 5.30 | 148 | 121 |
Akathimurippu Tank | 9 | 2,571 | 5,000 |
Kalmadu Tank | 11.29 | 1,396 | 750 |
Akkarayan kulam | 26.15 | 1,819 | 1,819 |
Kariyalai Nagapaduwan Tank | 14.54 | - | 502 |
Mallavikulam | 1.1 | 95 | 720 |
Welimaruthamadu Tank | 3.41 | 607 | 700 |
Maruthankulam | 2.810 | 182 | 725 |
Niththakaikulam | 2.4 | 202.34 | 200 |
Periyamdu Tank | 7.13 | 303 | 250 |
Piramanthalaru Kulam | 3.86 | 602 | 201 |
Kudamuruty Tank | 2.47 | 647 | - |
Paravipanchan Tank | 5.80 | 219 | 200 |
Chadayantalawa Tank | 3.95 | 1,134 | 1,150 |
Pulugunawai-Kankaniyar Tank | 9.96 | 2,114 | 1,690 |
Adachchakal Tank | 1.51 | 183 | 200 |
Meiyankal Tank | 7.95 | 1,012 | 920 |